Airbus 320 trying to land in crosswinds in Hamburg - Personal Opinion
The media have been buzzing last days, thanks to a video of an Airbus 320 going around in Hamburg, in strong crosswind situation, lightly hitting the left wing on the runway. Reporters made their usual job, and headlines ranged from “Hero Pilot Saves Hundreds of Lifes” to “A320 Nearly Crashed”.
I was somehow disappointed not to see something like “A Doomed Aircraft Threatens a Major City Before Crashing on A Kids School, Bringing Back Genetically Modified Dinosaurs Back To Life”. When all the burden will be over, it will be clear that all of it boils down to a few facts:
- The crew made its best to land in a very gusty crosswind situation
- A sudden gust took the aircraft away from its intended flight path
- The crew decided to go around and take a second approach
Gusts are by nature hard to predict. Landing in steady crosswind is a relatively easy and common thing, but gusts - particularly of that intensity - makes it much harder. Making the approach was a good decision, going around was good as well. The very timing of the go around could be questionned, but doing it after the incident is always much easier…
For me, the bottom line is that a crew went around in stormy conditions because the landing was no longer possible, hit the wingtip, and landed fine after second approach. Dot.
No crash, no catastrophe, an impressive incident. Everybody got on the ground safely. The dinosaurs have been added by media during post-production.
Video of the first landing attempt
Photo of the damage - The winglet is not even broken, but “only” folded below the wing






2 Comments, Comment or Ping
Ot
I saw the amateur video which shows the A320 jet coming in on a from a distance on a straight final and flying directly overhead of the videographer. The crab angle was too sever in my opinion before the jet made the numbers, and they should have aborted then, before a touchdown was attempted. There is an alternate runway perpendicular to the active, wonder why it wasn’t used instead. The crab angle made it appear that using the alternate runway would have made landing much safer.
Mar 7th, 2008
PlasticPilot
@Ot: the second attempt was succesful… on runway 33 - the one you mention in your comment. Why was the first approach to runway 23 ? May be the report will mention it. There could be political / noise / equipment / weather factors. Storms evolve rather quickly, and I don’t know what the winds were when they got their approach clearance.
The questions about go around decision time have the potential for an endless argument based on gusts and their occurence close to the ground, ground effect, and so on…
Mar 7th, 2008
Reply to “Airbus 320 trying to land in crosswinds in Hamburg - Personal Opinion”