<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does aviation need better black-boxes ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/2009/07/10/does-aviation-need-better-black-boxes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/2009/07/10/does-aviation-need-better-black-boxes/</link>
	<description>General Aviation and Aviation In General</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 09:23:43 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vincent</title>
		<link>http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/2009/07/10/does-aviation-need-better-black-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-23861</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 18:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/?p=2611#comment-23861</guid>
		<description>@Patrick: you should not underestimate the amount of data captured by the FDR. I think it would be possible over land using GSM, but think of the costs. Airlines should install massive data-centers. And there is no GSM over the oceanic areas.

I recommend that you read this &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?p=518782&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;forum post about FDRs&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Patrick: you should not underestimate the amount of data captured by the FDR. I think it would be possible over land using GSM, but think of the costs. Airlines should install massive data-centers. And there is no GSM over the oceanic areas.</p>
<p>I recommend that you read this <a href="http://forums.jetphotos.net/showthread.php?p=518782" rel="nofollow">forum post about FDRs</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Flannigan</title>
		<link>http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/2009/07/10/does-aviation-need-better-black-boxes/comment-page-1/#comment-23837</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Flannigan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.plasticpilot.net/blog/?p=2611#comment-23837</guid>
		<description>As far as CVR data goes, you may be right about the datalink system not being ready. As you pointed out, we&#039;re talking about multiple audio feeds per airplane.

But why can&#039;t FDR data be streamed back to the company in real time? We&#039;re just talking about raw text data aren&#039;t we? Surely the bandwidth cost is negligible for these uploads, especially if it is only sent during abnormal changes in power, g-loads or flight characteristics. 

Even if you can&#039;t send all the data over the web, surely something is better than nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as CVR data goes, you may be right about the datalink system not being ready. As you pointed out, we&#8217;re talking about multiple audio feeds per airplane.</p>
<p>But why can&#8217;t FDR data be streamed back to the company in real time? We&#8217;re just talking about raw text data aren&#8217;t we? Surely the bandwidth cost is negligible for these uploads, especially if it is only sent during abnormal changes in power, g-loads or flight characteristics. </p>
<p>Even if you can&#8217;t send all the data over the web, surely something is better than nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
