Are you IFR Rated ? Surprises in the results
“I’m not IFR rated because, because weather where I fly is too good”. Two commenters answered my “Are you IFR rated ?” readers poll this way, and to be fair this surprised me. I always lived in places where clouds are frequent all year round, and icy in winter. While I understand the “good weather” argument for not being IFR rated, I don’t fully agree with it.
Flying in IMC condition is one of the privileges, but it is not the only one. Depending where you fly, airspace structure can impose serious restrictions to VFR navigation. Julien, I know that Australia is a vast continent. JB, I don’t know in which part of Spain you fly, but I guess that airspace around Madrid or Barcelona is rather crowded, and the respective TMAs probably impose some deviations and indirect routes. Military airspace and other danger areas which are not always can also make VFR routing complex.
The IFR routes are not always direct, but flying the airways makes the planning, and in-flight navigation easier. No need for visual landmarks, no hard times to find the town north of the roads crossing with a castel on the east side, … IFR navigation is all VOR / NDB based, not to mention GPS. Even better, ATC frequently takes over the navigaton task, using radar vectoring. I imagine that many VFR pilots fly using the same means - except vectoring - when not flying super-easy routings like “around the lake”, “along the river”, or “beach on the right hand side”, in large areas away from controlled airspace.
Another thing I personally like in IFR is the simplicity of the approach and departure procedures. Flying holdings, track reversal procedures, VOR, NDB and ILS tracking are the building blocks of all approaches. No need to identify VFR reporting points, which is sometimes an art, if not a lottery. IFR navigation is so easy that it can become boring…
My longest flight to date was from Geneva (LSGG) to Biggin-Hill (EGKB) - click here to read more about it - and flying it IFR made the routing and the crossing of various TMAs en-route very easy. I was on the right seat on the VFR flights home, and negotiating all the crossing clearances kept me busy. Navigation was all VOR and GPS based, as flying accurately between restricted airspace using map, compass and clock over the vast areas of green in central France is not exactly easy
Flying IMC in a light aircraft is not always easy, nor possible. Without on-board weather radar, any forecast for embedded thunderstorm is a no-go. As some commenters correctly pointed out, entering or flying close to a thunderstorm in a light aircraft is simply not an option. Even airliners avoid them, so this is not the subject. I don’t exactly know on what the excellent record from François is based (thanks for it, indeed), but I guess that we’re talking mostly about a de-iced and radar equipped twin. Possibly pressurized ?
This discussion is not over, you can raise your voice via comment on this post, on or the original “Are you IFR rated” post. But please, as I mentionned there, I won’t approve any comment tending to oppose these two different ways of flying in an aggressive way.
PS: I’ll periodically post new reader’s polls. If you want to suggest one, contact me to submit your question.
Category: Pilots TalkTags: advantages IFR VFR





